← All guides

Franchise Royalty Comparison

Which brands take the most — and the least — from your gross revenue.

11 min read

Royalty rates get compared as percentages, but franchisees pay them in dollars. A 5% royalty on a $2M QSR location costs $100,000 per year. A 10% royalty on a $250K education franchise costs $25,000. The percentage comparison would tell you the education brand is "more expensive" — the dollar comparison tells the opposite story.

This analysis covers 146 brands with percentage-based royalty structures. The remaining 24 brands use profit splits, tiered rates, or flat-fee models that are not directly comparable on a percentage basis.

Category Royalty Benchmarks

Before looking at individual brands, understand what is normal for the category you are evaluating. A 6% royalty in automotive is above average; 6% in education is below average. Evaluating a brand against the wrong benchmark leads to incorrect conclusions.

Category Brands Avg Rate Low High
Automotive 12 4.4% 0.05% 10%
Casual Dining 1 4.5% 4.5% 4.5%
Hospitality 6 5.2% 5% 6%
Retail 6 5.3% 4% 6%
QSR 29 5.3% 4% 8%
Home Services 22 5.3% 0.05% 10%
Real Estate 5 5.4% 3% 6%
Food 17 5.8% 4% 8%
Personal Services 9 6.1% 6% 7%
Pet 8 6.3% 0.1% 12%
Senior Care 3 6.3% 4% 10%
Business Services 5 6.4% 5% 8%
Fitness 10 6.7% 5% 8%
Health and Wellness 1 7.0% 7% 7%
Education 11 8.5% 7% 11%
Staffing 1 40.0% 40% 40%

20 Lowest Royalty Rate Brands

Low royalty rates cluster in categories where the franchisor earns through other mechanisms — product markups in automotive, real estate commissions in brokerage, or volume rebates in retail. A low royalty is not free money; it usually means the franchisor is monetizing the relationship differently.

Brand Category Royalty Health
Right at Home Home Services 0.05% 89
Senior Helpers Home Services 0.05% 89
Comfort Keepers Home Services 0.05% 79
Home Instead Home Services 0.05% 79
Meineke Car Care Centers Automotive 0.05% 79
Valvoline Instant Oil Change Automotive 0.06% 99
Tint World Automotive 0.06% 32
Maaco Automotive 0.08% 58
Bark Busters Pet 0.1% 60
Pet Supplies Plus Pet 2% 89
HomeVestors of America Real Estate 3% 52
Culver's QSR 4% 94
Paul Davis Restoration Home Services 4% 89
Jiffy Lube Automotive 4% 84
Bojangles QSR 4% 79
Jan-Pro Home Services 4% 74
Wild Birds Unlimited Retail 4% 74
Griswold Home Care Senior Care 4% 73
Arby's QSR 4% 72
Hardee's QSR 4% 72

20 Highest Royalty Rate Brands

High royalties are not inherently bad if the franchisor delivers proportional value — stronger brand recognition, better unit economics, or genuine operational support that increases revenue. The test is whether the net income after royalties is higher than what a lower-royalty competitor produces.

Brand Category Royalty Avg Revenue
Express Employment Professionals Staffing 40% $6.0M
Pet Butler Pet 12%
Sylvan Learning Education 11% $811K
Mathnasium Education 10%
British Swim School Education 10% $580K
Lawn Doctor Home Services 10% $1.1M
Midas Automotive 10% $1.2M
Mosquito Authority Home Services 10% $465K
CarePatrol Senior Care 10% $346K
Mosquito Joe Home Services 10% $433K
Huntington Learning Centers Education 9.5% $590K
KidStrong Education 8.5%
Club Pilates Fitness 8% $984K
Crumbl Food 8% $1.4M
Dog Training Elite Pet 8% $254K
Ziebart Automotive 8% $1.3M
Sandler Business Services 8% $738K
Orangetheory Fitness Fitness 8% $857K
Panda Express QSR 8% $1.6M
School of Rock Education 8% $672K

Effective Royalty Burden: The Dollar Test

This is the comparison that actually matters for your P&L. Annual royalty cost in dollars — calculated as royalty rate multiplied by average Item 19 revenue — shows which brands extract the most cash from franchisees regardless of the percentage.

Highest Annual Royalty Cost

Brand Rate Avg Revenue Annual Royalty
Express Employment Professionals 40% $6.0M $2.4M
Mr. Rooter Plumbing 6% $7.8M $466K
Jan-Pro 4% $6.1M $244K
Paul Davis Restoration 4% $6.0M $240K
Interim HealthCare 5.5% $3.6M $201K
Primrose Schools 7% $2.7M $191K
The Goddard School 7% $2.4M $169K
Zaxby's 6% $2.8M $167K
Kiddie Academy 7% $2.2M $154K
Culver's 4% $3.8M $152K

The Royalty-to-Margin Ratio

The most useful way to evaluate a royalty is against your expected gross margin. If your category operates at 30% gross margin and the royalty is 6%, the franchisor takes 20% of your gross profit — before ad fund, tech fees, rent, or labor. At 50% gross margin, the same 6% royalty only captures 12% of gross profit.

This is why education franchises can sustain 8-10% royalties (margins are often 40-50%) while QSR brands at 5-6% royalties feel crushing (food cost alone is 28-35%, leaving gross margins of 20-30%). The absolute rate comparison misses the structural economics.

Before signing, calculate: (royalty + ad fund + tech fees) divided by your expected gross margin percentage. If that number exceeds 40%, the fee structure leaves very little room for the operator — and zero room for a bad quarter.

Royalty Comparison Across Systems Requires Revenue Normalization

Comparing a 4% royalty brand against a 7% royalty brand is meaningless without normalizing for revenue. A 4% royalty on $3.8M average revenue (Culver's) extracts $152K/year. A 7% royalty on $500K average revenue (a typical cleaning franchise) extracts $35K/year. The "lower royalty" brand costs the franchisee 4.3x more in absolute dollars. Revenue normalization also reveals that high-royalty systems often operate in categories where the royalty is a smaller share of available profit. A tutoring franchise at 9% royalty on $400K revenue ($36K royalty) with 45% gross margins still leaves $144K in gross profit after royalties — more than enough for a solo operator. A QSR at 5% on $1.2M ($60K royalty) with 25% gross margins leaves $240K in gross profit, but rent ($80K), labor ($120K), and insurance ($15K) consume it. The royalty percentage is only diagnostic when paired with: absolute dollar royalty cost, gross margin percentage, and the total cost structure of the category.

Same-Brand Royalty Changes Between FDD Vintages

Franchisors occasionally change their royalty structure between FDD filing years — increasing rates for new franchisees while grandfathering existing ones. This creates two classes of franchisees within the same system: legacy operators paying the original rate and new operators paying the current rate. The competitive implications are real: if you're a new franchisee paying 7% competing against a legacy franchisee in the adjacent territory paying 5%, they have a 2-point structural advantage on every dollar of revenue — $14K/year on $700K. This asymmetry also affects resale value: a legacy unit with a grandfathered lower royalty rate is worth more than a comparable unit under the current rate because the buyer inherits the lower cost structure. Check the current FDD's Item 6 against prior FDD filings (our FDD reading guide covers where to find these) (available from state regulators in registration states) to see if the royalty has changed. If it increased, ask the franchisor what percentage of current franchisees are on the old vs. new rate — that tells you whether the system is trending toward higher extraction and whether resale values may compress for current-rate units.

Related Guides

Compare Franchise Royalty Rates

More Franchise Guides

Browse all guides →